BIVORTEX FIELD EFFECTS
Copyright 2004 George William Kelly

If one uses as a paradigm an apple-shaped bivortex particle, one can attribute "attractive" gravity to the bivortex field acceleration which is exhibited by subparticles as they recycle toward the central, rotating axial tube of the bivortex particle. All subparticles in the bivortex field are attracted toward the central tube, either along its axis or into its two polar vortexes.

Similarly, one can attribute "repellent" gravity to the bivortex field acceleration exhibited by subparticles as they radiate outward along the bivortex equator when two opposing axial subparticle streams collide at the center of the bivortex tube.

The strength of bivortex attractive gravity presumably decreases with latitudinal distance from the poles, and that of bivortex repellent gravity with latitudinal distance from the equator.

The attractive gravity and repellent gravity described above apply to a single bivortex particle. They affect the subparticles comprising the bivortex particle itself as well as free subparticles in the vicinity of the bivortex particle.

Now consider what happens gravitationally when two separate spinning bivortex particles approach each other. Assume that each has within its bivortex field a halo and an equatorial disk consisting of subparticles. The two bivortex particles may approach with various orientations, for example, north pole up, north pole down, equator-to-equator, or pole-to-pole. The direction of physical force exerted, upon contact, by the outer subparticles of the two bivortex particles will depend upon the orientation of the two bivortex particles.

Let us use two apples of the same size for a thought experiment.

First, place both apples stem up on a table near each other. Rotate both apples counterclockwise. Assume that subparticles in the equatorial disk of each apple will make the initial contact midway between the two apples. Observe that the outer subparticles of the apple on the left and the outer subparticles of the apple on the right meet each other head-on. This should tend to slow their approach toward each other. In addition, the opposing subparticles would intermesh and cause the two to orbit each other, sharing an orbital axis.

Second, place one apple stem up and the other stem down. Rotate the stem-up apple counterclockwise as before, but rotate the stem-down apple clockwise. Observe that upon contact the outer subparticles of both apples move in the same direction. These subparticles should tend to push each other along and attract the two apples closer to each other.

Following is a description, similar to the above, of the behavior of vortexes in a fluid (p. 317, A. Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, 2003):

"Consider two vortices. . . . they repel each other by a logarithmic interaction. They move perpendicular to the force. Thus they end up circling each other. In contrast, consider a vortex and an antivortex, which attract each other. As a result of this attraction, they both move in the same direction, perpendicular to the straight line joining them (See Fig. VI.3.1). The vortex and antivortex move along in step, maintaining the distance between them."


Going back to our apples, the two stem-up apples thus would begin to circle each other without moving closer to each other. In effect, they would form a binary pair. The second two apples, one stem-up and the other stem down, would continue straight ahead side-by-side and perhaps eventually make full contact with each other. (This thought experiment is assuming that both apples are the same size and rotate at the same speed.)

Finally, let us assume that the two apples approach each other with a pole-to-pole orientation. Position both apples on the table with stem-end up. Lift one apple above the other. Rotate both apples counterclockwise. Lower the upper apple until it balances on top of the apple on the table. Continue rotating the bottom apple and observe that both apples now rotate counterclockwise as a single unit. Assume that this double-decker apple has now become a merged apple with one north pole and one south pole. (Before merger there were two north poles and two south poles.) This merged apple is twice the size of one of the single apples that we began with.

This double-decker-apple thought experiment has a striking resemblance to the creation of one heavy hydrogen (deuterium) atom from two hydrogen atoms. Let each apple represent one hydrogen nucleus (proton) with one electron off to the side. Add a second apple. The two apples will total two hydrogen nuclei (protons) with two electrons off to the side. Say that each hydrogen nucleus (proton) has a north pole vortex and a south pole vortex so that the two hydrogen nuclei will have a total of two north pole vortexes and two south pole vortexes. When one apple (proton) is placed on top of the other apple (proton), one south pole vortex and one north pole vortex merge, leaving us with only one north pole vortex and one south pole vortex. We now can call the upper apple a proton and the bottom apple a "neutron" (or vice versa). The merged apple will have only one electron off to the side. Apparently each north pole/south pole bivortex has room for only one electron off to the side. The other electron will be lost. We assume that the heavy hydrogen (deuterium) atom now acts as a single bivortex particle with a single electron, even though it has two apples (photon and "neutron") now stuck together or merged, pole-to-pole. The newly merged bivortex particle with two polar vortexes has one positive charge that holds only one electron even though it is now a "double proton" (one proton and one "neutron").

Once merged (with both joined-together apples rotating counterclockwise) the south pole vortex of the upper apple and the north pole vortex of the lower apple coalesce to become the center point in the double-length tube of the newly created double apple. Explosions of colliding subparticles at this center point will create a new equator for the double apple.

Taking this experiment another step, we could begin with four hydrogen apples and merge them into one helium apple containing two merged apples and two electrons, having lost two electrons. The new helium-apple would thus feature a binary pair of "double protons" (two protons and two "neutrons") orbiting around a common focus.

The outcome of this thought experiment suggests that for bivortex particles the various types of attraction or repellence are brought about by the mechanical interaction of subparticles moving along electromagnetic-style field patterns.
- posted by George William Kelly @ 3:21 PM